Simulation of integrated purification systems for hydrogen production in methanol steam reforming process

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Makek Ashtar University

2 Research Lab for Advanced Separation Processes, School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Iran

3 Northern Research Center for Science & Technology, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Iran

4 Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Fuel Cell Technology Research Laboratory

5 Malek Ashtar University of technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Recently, the use of clean energy has become the interest topic for researchers. Hydrogen has attracted the attention of researchers and industries as an alternative energy. Among the sources that exist for hydrogen production, methanol fuel is considered as an attractive feedstock for hydrogen production due to its advantages. The output stream from the methanol steam reforming reactor contains some carbon monoxide, and considering that carbon monoxide leads to fuel cell catalyst damage, its concentration should be reduced. In the present work, the focus is on the design and simulation of the purification system of the methanol steam reforming process. Therefore, in the present study, in order to reduce the concentration of carbon monoxide output of the reformer, the PROX unit was used. In this system, Pt/Al2O3 catalyst was used to increase the reaction rate. Aspen plus V11.0 software was used to simulate the PROX system. The results showed that carbon monoxide was completely removed from the system during the reactor. Next, in order to increase the concentration of hydrogen, the PSA column including activated carbon absorber was used as a purification system. Simulation and design of PSA process were done in Aspen adsorption V11.0 software. Hydrogen purity of 99.9915% was obtained in the output stream from the PSA column. To validation of the results obtained from the simulation, the present work was compared with the study of Abdeljaoued and et al [30]. The results obtained from the simulation showed the acceptable error percentage with the results of the article.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] P. Nikolaidis and A. Poullikkas, “A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes,” Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 67pp. 597-611, 2017.

[2] F. Dawood, M. Anda, and G. Shafiullah, “Hydrogen production for energy: An overview,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 7,pp. 3847-3869, 2020.

[3] K. Liu, C. Song, and V. Subramani, Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies.John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[4] M. Voldsund, K. Jordal, and R. Anantharaman,“Hydrogen production with CO2 capture,” International Journal of hydrogen energy, vol. 41, no. 9,pp. 4969-4992, 2016.
[5] L. Kaiwen, Y. Bin, and Z. Tao, “Economic analysis of hydrogen production from steam reforming process: A literature review,” Energy Sources, Part B:Economics, Planning, and Policy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.109-115, 2018.
[6] Y. S. Noh, K.-Y. Lee, and D. J. Moon, “Hydrogen production by steam reforming of methane over nickel based structured catalysts supported on calcium aluminate modified SiC,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 38, pp. 21010-21019, 2019.
[7] S. Xing, C. Zhao, S. Ban, H. Su, M. Chen, and H.Wang, “A hybrid fuel cell system integrated with methanol steam reformer and methanation reactor,”International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46,no. 2, pp. 2565-2576, 2021.
[8] J. Han, I.-s. Kim, and K.-S. Choi, “Purifier-integrated methanol reformer for fuel cell vehicles,”Journal of Power Sources, vol. 86, no. 1-2, pp. 223-227, 2000.
[9] C.-Z. Yao et al., “Effect of preparation method on the hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming over binary Cu/ZrO2 catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 297, no. 2, pp. 151-158,2006.
[10] A. Kundu, Y. G. Shul, and D. H. Kim, “Methanol reforming processes,” in Advances in fuel cells,vol. 1: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 419-472.
[11] T. L. LeValley, A. R. Richard, and M. Fan, “Theprogress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies–A review,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no.30, pp. 16983-17000, 2014.
[12] F. Mariño, C. Descorme, and D. Duprez, “Noble metal catalysts for the preferential oxidationof carbon monoxide in the presence of hydrogen(PROX),” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental,vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 59-66, 2004.
[13] M. Ouzounidou, D. Ipsakis, S. Voutetakis, S. Papadopoulou, and P. Seferlis, “A combined methanol autothermal steam reforming and PEM fuel cell pilot plant unit: Experimental and simulation studies,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1733-1743, 2009.
[14] N. Katiyar, S. Kumar, and S. Kumar, “Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell grade hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming: a comparative multiple reactor modeling study,” Journal of power sources, vol. 243, pp. 381-391, 2013.
[15] O. Laguna et al., “Influence of the O2/CO ratio and the presence of H2O and CO2 in the feed stream during the preferential oxidation of CO (PROX) over a CuOx/CeO2-coated microchannel Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage 10 (2023) 185-199198 reactor,” Catalysis Today, vol. 203, pp. 182-187,2013.
[16] A. Mishra and R. Prasad, “A review on preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in hydrogen rich gases,” Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2011.
[17] Y. Choi and H. G. Stenger, “Kinetics, simulation and insights for CO selective oxidation in fuel cell applications,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 246-254, 2004.
[18] N. Sazali, M. A. Mohamed, and W. N. W. Salleh,“Membranes for hydrogen separation: A significant review,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1859-1881, 2020.
[19] J. Xiao, Y. Peng, P. Bénard, and R. Chahine,“Thermal effects on breakthrough curves of pressure swing adsorption for hydrogen purification,”International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41,no. 19, pp. 8236-8245, 2016.
[20] Q. Huang and M. Eić, “Simulation of hydrogen purification by pressure-swing adsorption for application in fuel cells,” in Environanotechnology:Elsevier, 2010, pp. 221-244.
[21] A. M. Ribeiro, C. A. Grande, F. V. Lopes, J. M.Loureiro, and A. E. Rodrigues, “A parametric study of layered bed PSA for hydrogen purification,”Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 63, no. 21, pp.5258-5273, 2008.
[22] X. Zhuang, X. Xu, L. Li, and D. Deng, “Numerical investigation of a multichannel reactor for syngas production by methanol steam reforming at various operating conditions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 29, pp. 14790-14805, 2020.
[23] A. Chougule and R. R. Sonde, “Modelling and experimental investigation of compact packed bed design of methanol steam reformer,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 57, pp.29937-29945, 2019.
[24] J. Zhu, S. S. Araya, X. Cui, S. L. Sahlin, and S. K. Kær, “Modeling and design of a multi-tubular packed-bed reactor for methanol steam reforming over a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 610, 2020.
[25] K. Liu, A. Wang, and T. Zhang, “Recent advances in preferential oxidation of CO reaction over platinum group metal catalysts,” ACS catalysis, vol. 2,no. 6, pp. 1165-1178, 2012.
[26] F. V. Lopes, C. A. Grande, and A. E. Rodrigues,“Activated carbon for hydrogen purification by pressure swing adsorption: Multicomponent breakthrough curves and PSA performance,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 303-317,2011.
[27] T. Keller and G. Shahani, “PSA technology: Beyond hydrogen purification,” Chemical Engineering, vol. 123, no. 1, p. 50, 2016.
[28] D. H. Kim and M. S. Lim, “Kinetics of selective CO oxidation in hydrogen-rich mixtures on Pt/alumina catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol.224, no. 1-2, pp. 27-38, 2002.
[29] F. Cipitì and V. Recupero, “Design of a CO preferential oxidation reactor for PEFC systems: A modelling approach,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 128-135, 2009.
[30] A. Abdeljaoued, F. Relvas, A. Mendes, and M.H. Chahbani, “Simulation and experimental results Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage 10 (2023) 185-199199 of a PSA process for production of hydrogen used in fuel cells,” Journal of Environmental ChemicalEngineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 338-355, 2018.
[31] J. J. Lee, M. K. Kim, D. G. Lee, H. Ahn, M. J. Kim, and C. H. Lee, “Heat‐exchange pressure swing adsorption process for hydrogen separation,”AIChE journal, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2054-2064, 2008.
[32] J. Xiao, R. Li, P. Benard, and R. Chahine, “Heat and mass transfer model of multicomponent adsorption system for hydrogen purification,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 40, no.14, pp. 4794-4803, 2015.
Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage
Volume 10, Issue 3
September 2023
Pages 158-199

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics