Impact of product gas recycling on steam methane reforming performance with Ni and Rh catalysts

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Iran

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of gas product recycling (GPR) on the performance of the steam methane reforming (SMR) process using nickel (Ni) and rhodium (Rh) catalysts. Hydrogen production, a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels, predominantly employs SMR due to its industrial efficacy. The study utilizes numerical simulations with Cantera software to evaluate the effects of recycling up to 30% of gaseous products at temperatures of 800, 1000, and 1200 Kelvin and a steam-to-methane ratio of 3. Key governing equations, including mass and energy conservation, as well as reaction kinetics described by the Arrhenius equation, are applied. The simulations reveal that GPR at 1200 K with a Ni catalyst enhances syngas production and reduces CO2 leakage, making it a viable option within the 20-30% recycling range. However, GPR at lower temperatures (800 K and 1000 K) for both Ni and Rh catalysts, and at 1200 K for Rh catalysts, results in undesirable increases in carbon deposition and CO2 production. Thus, GPR is generally not recommended for Rh catalysts due to significant coke formation. These findings underscore the potential benefits and limitations of GPR in optimizing SMR processes, particularly highlighting the suitability of Ni catalysts at higher temperatures.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Bhat SA, Sadhukhan J. Process intensification aspects for steam methane reforming: an overview. AIChE
Journal. 2009;55(2):408–422.
[2] Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2017;67:597–611.
[3] Palma V, Ricca A, Meloni E, Martino M, Miccio M, Ciambelli P. Experimental and numerical investigations on structured catalysts for methane steam reforming intensification. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;111:217–230.
[4] Kuncharam BVR, Dixon AG. Multi-scale twodimensional packed bed reactor model for industrial steam methane reforming. Fuel Processing Technology. 2020;200:106314.
[5] Saeidi S, Fazlollahi F, Najari S, Iranshahi D, Klemeˇs JJ, Baxter LL. Hydrogen production: Perspectives, separation with special emphasis on kinetics of WGS reaction: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2017;49:1–25.
[6] Cao C, Zhang N, Chen X, Cheng Y. A comparative study of Rh and Ni coated microchannel reactor for steam methane reforming using CFD with detailed chemistry. Chemical Engineering Science. 2015;137:276–286.
[7] Numaguchi T, Kikuchi K. Intrinsic kinetics and design simulation in a complex reaction network; steammethane reforming. In: Tenth international symposium on chemical reaction engineering. Elsevier; 1988. p. 2295–2301.
[8] Xu J, Froment GF. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE journal. 1989;35(1):88–96.
[9] Wang X, Gorte R. A study of steam reforming of hydrocarbon fuels on Pd/ceria. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2002;224(1-2):209–218.
[10] Rakass S, Oudghiri-Hassani H, Rowntree P, Abatzoglou N. Steam reforming of methane over unsupported nickel catalysts. Journal of Power sources. 2006;158(1):485–496.
[11] Zhu T, van Grootel PW, Filot IA, Sun SG, van Santen RA, Hensen EJ. Microkinetics of steam methane reforming on platinum and rhodium metal surfaces. Journal of catalysis. 2013;297:227–235.
[12] Panagakos G, Kyriakides A, Papadopoulou S, Voutetakis S. A computational investigation of hydrogen production from methane steam reactor. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2015;45:1033–1038.
[13] Arora S, Prasad R. An overview on dry reforming of methane: strategies to reduce carbonaceous deactivation of catalysts. RSC advances. 2016;6(110):108668–108688.
[14] German ED, Sheintuch M. Methane steam reforming rates over Pt, Rh and Ni (111) accounting for H tunneling and for metal lattice vibrations. Surface Science. 2017;656:126–139.
[15] Abbas SZ, Dupont V, Mahmud T. Kinetics study and modelling of steam methane reforming process over a NiO/Al2O3 catalyst in an adiabatic packed bed reactor. International journal of hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(5):2889–2903.
[16] Vasquez Castillo JM, Sato T, Itoh N. Microkinetic analysis of the methane steam reforming on a Rusupported catalytic wall reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(31):8815–8822.
[17] Saeedi A, Allahdadi N. Numerical Investigation of the Performance of Hydrogen Production Process by Production Gas Recirculation. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2021;53(1 (Special Issue)):623–638.
[18] Saeedi A, Zangooei F. Numerical Investigation of Steam Methane Reforming over Ni-and Rh-based Catalysts to Produce Hydrogen, Syngas and Reduce Surface Coverage. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2022;54(7):1587–1606.
[19] Goodwin DG, Moffat HK, Weber BW. Cantera: An object- oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics,
thermodynamics, and transport processes; 2021.
[20] Kee RJ, Coltrin ME, Glarborg P. Chemically reacting flow: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
[21] Thormann J, Maier L, Pfeifer P, Kunz U, Deutschmann O, Schubert K. Steam reforming of hexadecane over a Rh/CeO2 catalyst in microchannels: Experimental and numerical investigation. international journal of hydrogen energy. 2009;34(12):5108–5120.
[22] Ohayre R, Cha SW, Colella W, Prinz FB. Fuel cell fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
[23] Maier L, Sch¨adel B, Herrera Delgado K, Tischer S, Deutschmann O. Steam reforming of methane over
nickel: development of a multi-step surface reaction mechanism. Topics in catalysis. 2011;54:845–858.
[24] Karakaya C, Maier L, Deutschmann O. Surface reaction kinetics of the oxidation and reforming of CH4 over Rh/Al2O3 catalysts. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 2016;48(3):144–160.
[25] Ryu JH, Lee KY, La H, Kim HJ, Yang JI, Jung H. Ni catalyst wash-coated on metal monolith with enhanced
heat-transfer capability for steam reforming. Journal of Power Sources. 2007;171(2):499–505.
[26] Sch¨adel BT, Duisberg M, Deutschmann O. Steam reforming of methane, ethane, propane, butane, and natural gas over a rhodium-based catalyst. Catalysis today. 2009;142(1-2):42–51.
Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage
Volume 11, Issue 3
September 2024
Pages 169-178

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics