Thermo-Economic Analysis of Triple Production System, Combination with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Absorption Chiller

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Malek Ashtar University of technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This article introduces and analyzes the thermodynamic and economic performance of two triple hybrid systems that generate power, thermal and refrigeration energy. The primary drive is a hybrid cycle consisting of a gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell, supplemented by single-effect and double-effect absorption chillers as the secondary drive. Given the significance of the fuel cells in this system, detailed thermodynamic and thermal and electrochemical analyses have been conducted to ensure accurate calculations. The study examines that the impact of the compressor pressure ratio and air-to-fuel ratio on energy and exergy efficiency, exergy destruction and exergy loss rates, system costs and heating and cooling production. Results indicate that increasing the compressor pressure ratio enhances electrical and exergy efficiency system while reducing exergy destruction rates and electricity costs. Additionally, switching from a single-effect to a double-effect absorption chiller reduces exergy destruction by 5.4% but increases electricity production costs by 28%.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Kerr T. Combined heat and power: evaluating the benefits of greater global investment. Retrieved from IEA. 2008;1(22).
[2] Chen X, Zhou H, Li W, Yu Z, Gong G, Yan Y, et al. Multi-criteria assessment and optimization study on 5 kW PEMFC based residential CCHP system. Energy conversion and management. 2018;160:384–395.
[3] Yang X, Zhao H, Hou Q. Proposal and thermodynamic performance study of a novel LNGfueled SOFC-HAT-CCHP system with near-zero CO2 emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(38):19691–19706.
[4] Hou Q, Zhao H, Yang X. Thermodynamic performance study of the integrated MR-SOFC-CCHP system. Energy. 2018;150:434–450.
[5] Liu Y, Han J, You H. Performance analysis of a CCHP system based on SOFC/GT/CO2 cycle and ORC with LNG cold energy utilization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(56):29700–29710.
[6] Marefati M, Mehrpooya M, Mousavi SA. Introducing an integrated SOFC, linear Fresnel solar field, Stirling engine and steam turbine combined cooling, heating and power process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(57):30256–30279.
[7] Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Moghadam AJ, Farzaneh-Gord M, Arabkoohsar A. Performance investigation of a novel hybrid system for simultaneous production of cooling, heating, and electricity. Sustainable Energy Technologies and
Assessments. 2021;43:100931.
[8] Peng MYP, Chen C, Peng X, Marefati M. Energy and exergy analysis of a new combined concentrating solar collector, solid oxide fuel cell, and steam turbine CCHP system. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2020;39:100713.
[9] da Silva FS, Matelli JA. Exergoeconomic analysis and determination of power cost in MCFC–steam turbine combined cycle. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(33):18293–18307.
[10] Hosseini SS, Mehrpooya M, Alsagri AS, Alrobaian AA. Introducing, evaluation and exergetic performance assessment of a novel hybrid system composed of MCFC, methanol synthesis process, and a combined power cycle. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019;197:111878.
[11] Zeng R, Guo B, Zhang X, Li H, Zhang G. Study on thermodynamic performance of SOFCCCHP system integrating ORC and double-effect ARC. Energy Conversion and Management. 2021;242:114326.
[12] Zhong L, Yao E, Zou H, Xi G. Thermo-economicenvironmental analysis of an innovative combined cooling and power system integrating Solid Oxide Fuel Cell, Supercritical CO2 cycle, and ejector refrigeration cycle. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2021;47:101517.
[13] Behzadi A, Habibollahzade A, Zare V, Ashjaee M. Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid biomass-based SOFC/GT/double effect absorption chiller/RO desalination system with CO2 recycle. Energy conversion and management. 2019;181:302–318.
[14] Zheng N, Duan L, Wang X, Lu Z, Zhang H. Thermodynamic performance analysis of a novel PEMEC-SOFC-based poly-generation system integrated mechanical compression and thermal energy storage. Energy Conversion and Management. 2022;265:115770.
[15] Wang Q, Duan L, Lu Z, Zheng N. Thermodynamic performance comparison of SOFC-MGTCCHP systems coupled with two different solar methane steam reforming processes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48(71):27473–
27491.
[16] Zheng N, Zhang H, Duan L, Wang Q. Comprehensive sustainability assessment of a novel solar-driven PEMEC-SOFC-based combined cooling, heating, power, and storage (CCHPS) system based on life cycle method. Energy. 2023;265:126343.
[17] Yang S, Peng S, Xiao Z, Liu Z, Deng C, Du W, et al. Energetic and exergetic analysis of a biomass-fueled CCHP system integrated with proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48(36):13603–
13616.
[18] Ghorbani S, Deymi-Dashtebayaz M, Dadpour D, Delpisheh M. Parametric study and optimization of a novel geothermal-driven combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system. Energy. 2023;263:126143.
[19] Zhang X, Liu W, Pan J, Zhao B, Yi Z, He X, et al. Comprehensive performance assessment of a novel biomass-based CCHP system integrated with SOFC and HT-PEMFC. Energy. 2024;295:131112.
[20] Jia J, Paul MC. Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a CCHP system with biomass gasifier, Stirling engine, internal combustion engine and absorption chiller. Energy Conversion and Management. 2024;299:117803.
[21] Huang Z, You H, Chen D, Hu B, Liu C, Xiao Y, et al. Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analyses and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP system based on solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid power cycle. Fuel.
2024;368:131649.
[22] Huang S, Duan L, Wang Q, Huang L, Zhang H. Thermodynamic analysis of a CCHP system with hydrogen production process by methane reforming enhanced by solar-assisted chemical looping adsorption. Applied Thermal Engineering.
2024;248:123137.
[23] Wang L, Bo G, Gao R, Ayadi M, Chammam W, Ooi JB, et al. Thermoeconomic assessment of an innovative combined cooling, heating, and power system based on biomass combustion, TCO2 cycle, absorption chiller, and desalination. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024;184:151–169.
[24] Gomri R. Second law comparison of single effect and double effect vapour absorption refrigeration systems. Energy Conversion and Management. 2009;50(5):1279–1287.
[25] Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell. International Journal of hydrogen energy. 2008;33(20):5811–5822.
[26] Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer G. Thermodynamic analysis of a combined gas turbine power system with a solid oxide fuel cell through exergy. Thermochimica Acta. 2008;480(1-2):1–9.
[27] Zare V. A comparative thermodynamic analysis of two tri-generation systems utilizing low-grade geothermal energy. Energy conversion and management. 2016;118:264–274.
[28] Yuksel YE, Ozturk M, Dincer I. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated system using waste material gasification for hydrogen production and liquefaction. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019;185:718–729.
[29] Anvari S, Khalilarya S, Zare V. Exergoeconomic and environmental analysis of a novel configuration of solar-biomass hybrid power generation system. Energy. 2018;165:776–789.
[30] Chan S, Ho H, Tian Y. Modelling of simple hybrid solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine power plant. Journal of power sources. 2002;109(1):111–120.
[31] Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell. International Journal of hydrogen energy. 2008;33(20):5811–5822.