Investigating the Effects of Operating Parameters on Hydroxy Gas Production through Solar-Powered Alkaline Water Electrolysis: a COMSOL Simulation and Experimental Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Marine Engineering Department Military Technological College, Muscat

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Technology Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Depletion of conventional fossil fuels poses a significant concern, especially in transportation, where demand exceeds the production rate, hence, risk of fuel crisis. Fossil fuel combustion also heavily pollutes the environment, impacting global quality of life. Therefore, renewable and clean energy alternatives are urgently needed for sustainability. Hydrogen energy, particularly when sourced from renewable power like solar or wind, presents a promising solution. This study explores a unique approach to hydrogen production through a solar-powered alkaline electrolyzer, using both simulation and experimental testing to optimize its efficiency. The study uses COMSOL Multiphysics to simulate various operating conditions, which were then validated experimentally. Key operating parameters such as electrode spacing, electrolyte concentration, and temperature were systematically adjusted to identify conditions that maximize gas output. An innovative control system monitored and regulated the gas pressure, automatically shutting off the electrolyzer at 1.8 bars to ensure safety and efficiency. Findings highlight how close electrode spacing, higher electrolyte concentration, and elevated temperatures significantly boost hydrogen production.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Wang J, Azam W. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geoscience Frontiers. 2024;15(2):101757. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/pii/S1674987123002244.
[2] Holechek JL, Geli HME, Sawalhah MN, Valdez R. A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050? Sustainability. 2022;14(8). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4792.
[3] Chi J, Yu H. Water electrolysis based on renewable energy for hydrogen production. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2018;39(3):390–394. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872206717629498.
[4] Hren R, Vujanovic A, Van Fan Y, Klemes JJ, Krajnc D, Cucek L. Hydrogen production, storage and transport for enewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023;173:113113. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122009947.
[5] Bratsch SG. Standard Electrode Potentials and Temperature Coefficients in Water at 298.15 K. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 1989 01;18(1):1–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555839.
[6] Ursua A, San Martin I, Barrios EL, Sanchis P. Stand-alone operation of an alkaline water electrolyser fed by wind and photovoltaic systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(35):14952–14967. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319913023082.
[7] Tjarks G, Mergel J, Stolten D. In: Dynamic Operation of Electrolyzers - Systems Design and Operating Strategies; 2016. p. 309–330.
[8] Schalenbach M, Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D. Pressurized PEM water electrolysis: Efficiency and gas crossover. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(35):14921–14933. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319913022040.
[9] Schr¨oder V, Emonts B, Janßen H, Schulze HP. Explosion Limits of Hydrogen/Oxygen Mixtures at Initial Pressures up to 200 bar. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2004;27(8):847–851. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
doi/abs/10.1002/ceat.200403174.
[10] Hug W, Divisek J, Mergel J, Seeger W, Steeb H. Highly efficient advanced alkaline electrolyzer for solar operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1992;17(9):699–705. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/pii/036031999290090J.
[11] Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008;12(2):553–563. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032106001158.
[12] David M, Ocampo-Mart´ınez C, S´anchezPe˜na R. Advances in alkaline water electrolyzers: A review. Journal of Energy Storage. 2019;23:392–403. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S2352152X18306558.
[13] Ishaq H, Dincer I. Comparative assessment of renewable energy-based hydrogen production methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;135:110192. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120304822.
[14] Boretti A. Hydrogen internal combustion engines to 2030. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(43):23692–23703. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319920321595.
[15] Zareei J, Mahmood F, Abdullah S. Theoretical study of the effect of hydrogen addition to natural gas-fueled direct-injection engines. Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage. 2014;1(1):11–20. Available from: https://hfe.irost.ir/article_9.html.
[16] Haverkort JW, Rajaei H. Voltage losses in zero-gap alkaline water electrolysis. Journal of Power Sources. 2021;497:229864. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877532100402X.
[17] Wilcox GD, Gabe DR. Faraday’s Laws of Electrolysis. Transactions of the IMF. 1992;70(2):93–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00202967.1992.11870951.
[18] Laugier A, Garai J. Derivation of the Ideal Gas Law. Journal of Chemical Education. 2007;84(11):1832. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1832.
Hydrogen, Fuel Cell & Energy Storage
Volume 12, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 9-18

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics